Quantcast
Search Daily Dose & Film Annex
Loading

BIO SmartBrief

Daily Dose Newsletter

 
Fill out your e-mail address
to receive the DDE newsletter.
E-mail:
First:
Last:
 

Daily Dose Newsroom is a Daily Dose of Wall Street research and news in the Healthcare, Biotech, and Biomedical sectors.

____________________________________________________________________________

Entries in cytx (11)

Tuesday
Mar272012

Data From American College of Cardiology: $NBS, $BAX, $ASTM, $CMXI

Data came out over the weekend in Advance of the American College of Cardiology meeting in Chicago. The article reviews the Focus-CCTRN trial which uses autologous bone marrow to treat heart disease in a Phase II trial.  Specifically the trial evaluates the injection of bone marrow in ischemic cardiomyopathy.   This trial is similar to what Baxter is working on in their phase III trial using not bone marrow but what they believe is the active cell in marrow, CD 34+ cells. Incidentally this is similar to what NeoStem is doing with the Phase II Amorcyte Heart Attack “PRESERVE” trial which is using IRA (Infarct related artery) injection of CD 34+ cells (NeoStem is also doing the manufacturing for Baxter).
 
The results of the study are fascinating. They showed that the greatest efficacy was shown in those patients who received the greatest number of CD 34 cells.
 
Specifically the article states: 

"A regression analysis showed that higher CD34 cell or CD133 cell counts were associated with greater absolute unit increase in LVEF. The range of CD34 was 0.5% to 6.9% (SD, 1.2%). Assuming that differences of 1.96 for SD or 2.4% are more likely due to biological variability, the effect of differences in CD34 cell level beyond that expected due to natural variability was examined, using a 3% level to be conservative. Every 3% higher level of CD34 cells was associated with on average a 3.0% greater absolute unit increase in LVEF in a multiple variable model that included age and treatment as predictor variables (3.06 [95% CI, 0.14-5.98];P=.04)."

This article seems to confirm what NeoStem’s Chief Medical officer, Andrew Pecora MD, and Phase II Trial Investigator, Arshed Quyyumi MD, FRCP wrote in their Letter to the editor (Published in JAMA, March 14, 2012) that reviews the results from another Bone Marrow Trial (The Late TIME trial) that was presented last Fall at the American Heart Association (AHA).

“In the Late TIME trial, treated patients received a median CD34 cell dose of 3.8±1.5x106 cells, well below 10x106 CD34 cells. Additionally, in vitro SDF-1 mobility of the infused cells was not measured and may have been adversely affected by the absence of autologous serum in the infused product. Future studies must account for the quantity and mobility of infused (potent) cells before conclusions regarding efficacy are made.”

Daily Dose Conclusion: A lot of work has been done with Bone Marrow cells and its all shown trends but there have not been any home runs. The data seems to be pointing to the active ingredient (there may be more than one, that’s for sure) is CD 34+ cells. Patinets with greater numbers of these cells  are showing efficacy. The Amorcyte Phase 1 data was very compelling showing a statistically valid correlation between the number of CD 34 + CXCR4+ cells and the effect on both perfusion and infarct size. The fact that Baxter is also pursuing a CD 34+ cell approach is validating. The trial is being run by Dr. Doug Losordo  who is considered a Key Opinion Leader (KOL) and Pioneer in cell therapy. Dr. Losordo’s team last summer published the results of experiments that showed that among all the various cells present in marrow, it is the CD 34+ cells that generate the greatest amount of blood vessel growth.

Daily Dose Equities - Effect of Transendocardial Delivery - CCTRN TrialThis article showed in a sub-group analysis that patients with higher numbers of CD34+ cells did best.
View more documents from ProActive Capital Resources Group
This article is published by Dr. Doug Losordo, who since the article was printed, has joined Baxter to run their CD 34+ Cardiac Ischemia Trial (Angina – heart pain).
View more documents from ProActive Capital Resources Group
Two Letters to the Editor of JAMA; 1) Dr Hung Q Ly MD, MSC, FRCPC and 2) Drs. Arshed Quyyumi and Andrew Pecora (NeoStem) discuss the flaws in the LATE-Time trial.
View more documents from ProActive Capital Resources Group
Key markets covered include:
  • Stem Cell Research
  • Cardiac Heart Repair
  • Benefits of using your own cells
  • Stem Cell Trials
  • Heart Attack Cell Therapy
  • Proof of Concept
  • Clinical Trial Data
Thursday
Mar152012

JAMA: Letter to the Editor : Intracoronary Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells After Myocardial Infarction

We picked up on a JAMA letter to the editor (below) that reviews data from the TIME trial that was presented last fall. The author, Drs Arshed Quyyumi (NeoStem PI) and Andrew Pecora (NeoStem CMO) clearly identify that the effective dose given in the "Late TIME" trial appears to have been low , (3.8 million CD 34 cells) versus data that the Amorcyte trial reported that an effective biological threshold exists at 10 million cells. The authors in the letter to the editor state:

In the LateTIME trial, treated patients received a median CD34 cell dose of 3.8±1.5 x106 cells, well below 10 x106 CD34 cells. Additionally, in vitro SDF-1 mobility of the infused cells was not measured and may have been adversely affected by the absence of autologous serum in the infused product. Future studies must account for the quantity and mobility of infused (potent) cells before conclusions regarding efficacy are made.

Daily Dose Conclusion: NeoStem (NBS)  and Baxter (BAX) are both pursuing the use of CD 34+ cells in STEMI and CMI (angina) respectively. CytoMedix just reported that ALD-br cells show hints of efficacy and Aastrom seems to be moving forward in DCM. All cardiology indications. The NeoStem message is focused on the dose, timing and method of delivery, biological effect and clinical outcome. We see this as a core strength and part of what Progenitor Cell therapy (PCT) brings to the company.

On a separate note we believe Cardiology is the next major breakthrough to be seen in the regenerative medicine space. While NeoStem is well positioned as a manufacturer for Baxter and their own Amorcyte the company also has attractive valuation measures. That is not to say that other players like Aastrom , Athersys and Cytori are likely to move forward with P2/3 plans in the cardiac care space. Also keep an eye out for MesoBlast which has seen a decline in valuation since the TIME (& their own data) was presented at AHA last fall.


Thursday
Mar152012

Cytomedix ($CMXI) in American Heart Journal For Positive Phase I Clinical Data Using ALD-201 to Treat Ischemic Heart Failure

Cytomedix, Inc. (OTCBB: CMXI) develops, sells and licenses regenerative biological therapies primarily for wound care, inflammation and angiogenesis. The Company markets the AutoloGel™ System, a device for the production of autologous platelet rich plasma ("PRP") gel for use on a variety of exuding wounds; the Angel® Whole Blood Separation System, a blood processing device and disposable products used for the separation of whole blood into red cells, platelet poor plasma ("PPP") and PRP in surgical settings; and the activAT® Autologous Thrombin Processing Kit, which produces autologous thrombin serum from PPP. The activAT® kit is sold exclusively in Europe and Canada, where it provides a completely autologous, safe alternative to bovine-derived products. On February 8, 2012 Cytomedix closed the acquisition of Aldagen, a biopharmaceutical company developing regenerative cell therapies based on its proprietary ALDH bright cell ("ALDH(br)") technology, currently in a Phase 2 trial for the treatment of ischemic stroke.

Daily Dose Conclusion: This is not new news for Aldagen (now part of CytoMedix) but does remind us that among the various cells in bone marrow, there are specific populations of cells, in this case, ALD-br cells, that are prolific elicitors of neoangiogenesis (capable of forming and fostering new blood vessel formation) . Our expectation is that CytoMedix will focus on CLI trial. Recall that Aastrom is now in a pivotal trial with their bone marrow (expanded cells) and PluriStem (PSTI) is hoping to begin their Phase II trial with their placental derived (allogeneic) cell product. From a COGS view point it’s likely that PSTI's product will be the cheapest to make, and Aastrom has the lead to the marketplace. Also know that in the wings are the adipose derived players such as Cytori and even device make Thermogenesis (KOOL). This could be local processing and also a very cheaply produced product. As such we have our concerns regarding the classic SWAT (Strength, Opportunities, threats & Weakness) and how each of the CLI players will score on these metrics.

Today's Press Release: CMXI announced that positive data from a Phase 1 clinical trial of ALD-201 to treat ischemic heart failure were published in the March 2012 online edition of the American Heart Journal. In the study, ALD-201 was considered safe and demonstrated initial evidence of improved blood flow and improved clinical status. ALD-201 is a population of biologically instructive adult stem cells (aldehyde dehydrogenase bright cells, or ALDH(br)) that are selected from the patient's own bone marrow using the ALDH enzyme as a marker. The article is titled:

"Randomized, double-blind pilot study of transendocardial injection of autologous aldehyde dehydrogenase-bright stem cells in patients with ischemic heart failure." 

The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1 study included 20 heart failure patients with no treatment options. The primary end point was safety and secondary end points included several well-accepted clinical measurements. The patients received either an injection of ALD-201 directly into the heart muscle, or an injection of an equivalent volume of placebo using the same catheter delivery system. Investigators assessed patients for endpoints for the first six months after the injection and then followed them for an additional six months.

In the study ALD-201, including injection into the myocardium, was considered to be safe and well tolerated. After six months, the subjects who received ALD-201 demonstrated an improvement in MaxVO2, a measure of the body's ability to take up oxygen during exercise, while the placebo group did not. These findings support the ability of ALDH(br) cells to promote angiogenesis and restore blood flow to the ischemic heart muscle.

Commenting on the results of the Phase 1 study, Principal Investigator, Emerson C. Perin, M.D., Ph.D., Director of the Stem Cell Center at the Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, and the Adult Cardiology Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital in Houston, noted,

"The preliminary evidence suggests improved perfusion and a trend toward improved functional capacity in no-option heart failure patients treated with ALDH(br) cells. Importantly, we presented a unique approach for selecting a diverse population of active cells for cell therapy by using a physiologic rather than a single phenotypic marker, which may result in the isolation of a more efficacious population comprising the multiple cell types required for ischemic repair."

About Ischemic Heart Failure

Ischemic heart failure is caused by a reduction of blood flow to the muscles of the heart, which is most commonly caused by an obstruction of the arteries feeding blood to the heart tissue. As a result, the insufficient provision of oxygen and nutrients reduces the heart's ability to pump blood efficiently to the rest of the body. Current treatment options for ischemic heart failure include surgical procedures, bi-ventricular pacers, drug therapies, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and ventricular assist devices. For some patients, these treatments are not effective or appropriate. Once ischemic heart failure patients have exhausted all potential revascularization options, their only other option is a heart transplant, if they are eligible.

Tuesday
Feb142012

BBC: Stem cells used to 'heal' heart attack scars

An exciting article appeared in the BBC many weeks ago, and continues to cycle through the media. It has to do with some exciting but early work done in the area of expanding heart cells (myocytes).

_________________________________

Damage caused by a heart attack has been healed using stem cells gathered from the patient's own heart, according to doctors in the US.

The amount of scar tissue was halved in the small safety trial reported in the Lancet medical journal.

The authors said there was also an "unprecedented" increase in new heart muscle.

The British Heart Foundation said it was "early days", but could "be great news for heart attack patients". A heart attack happens when the organ is starved of oxygen, such as a clot blocking the flow of blood to the heart.

As the heart heals, the dead muscle is replaced with scar tissue, but because this does not beat like heart muscle the ability to pump blood around the body is reduced.

Doctors around the world are looking at ways of "regenerating" the heart to replace the scar tissue with beating muscle. Stem cells, which can transform into any other type of specialised cell, figure prominently in their plans.

Heart to heart

This trial, at the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, was designed to test the safety of using stem cells taken from a heart attack patient's own heart.

Healing the Heart

This is the second group of doctors to report using cells taken from a heart to heal a heart. In November 2011, another safety trial showed the cells could be used to heal the hearts of heart failure patients who were having heart bypass surgery. The heart is not the only source for these stem cells and other fields are much further ahead.

The largest ever trial of stem cell therapy in heart attack patients is about to get under way in Europe. The BAMI trial will inject 3,000 heart attack patients with stem cells taken from their bone marrow within five days of the heart attack.  {(We know a little bit about this trial, it is based on bone marrow derrived cells that home to the peri-infarc zone via an ischemic gradient.  This is very similar to the mechanism of action that NeoStem's (NBS) Amorcyte claims on their bone marrow derrived cells (CD 34+ /CXCR4+) enriched marrow cells, injected into the IRA (infarc related artery). The BAMI trial is similar in design to NBS trial but with a few major differences. The product is not enriiched for CD 34+ cells and the dose is not as concentrated).}

Within a month of a heart attack, a tube was inserted into a vein in the patient's neck and was pushed down towards the heart. A sample of heart tissue, about "half the size of a raisin", was taken. This was taken to the laboratory where the stem cells were isolated and grown. Up to 25 million of these stem cells were then put into the arteries surrounding the heart. Twenty five patients took part in the trial. Before the treatment, scar tissue accounted for an average of 24% of their left ventricle, a major chamber of the heart. It went down to 16% after six months and 12% after a year. Healthy heart muscle appeared to take its place. The study said the cells, "have an unprecedented ability to reduce scar and simultaneously stimulate the regrowth of healthy [heart] tissue".

One of the researchers Dr Eduardo Marban said: "While the primary goal of our study was to verify safety, we also looked for evidence that the treatment might dissolve scar and regrow lost heart muscle. "This has never been accomplished before, despite a decade of cell therapy trials for patients with heart attacks. Now we have done it. "The effects are substantial, and surprisingly larger in humans than they were in animal tests."

 Dr. Iqbal Malik: ''This is one small step''

However, there was no increase in a significant measure of the heart's ability to pump - the left ventricle ejection fraction: the percentage of blood pumped out of the left ventricle.

Prof Anthony Mathur, who is co-ordinating a stem cell trial involving 3,000 heart attack patients, said that even if the study found an increase in ejection fraction then it would be the source of much debate.

He argued that as it was a proof-of-concept study, with a small group of patients, "proving it is safe and feasible is all you can ask".

"The findings would be very interesting, but obviously they need further clarification and evidence," he added. Prof Jeremy Pearson, associate medical director at the British Heart Foundation, said: "It's the first time these scientists' potentially exciting work has been carried out in humans, and the results are very encouraging. "These cells have been proven to form heart muscle in a petri dish but now they seem to be doing the same thing when injected back into the heart as part of an apparently safe procedure.

"It's early days, and this research will certainly need following up, but it could be great news for heart attack patients who face the debilitating symptoms of heart failure."

Wednesday
Feb012012

ThermoGenesis ($KOOL) now in CLI ! (video)

ThermoGenesis Corp (NASDAQ: KOOL) press released an update on their Res-Q clinical evaluations:

ThermoGenesis Provides Update on Res-Q® Clinical Evaluations at Leading Stem Cell Therapy Conference

INITIAL DATA SHOW POSITIVE OUTCOMES IN TREATING CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA AND LONG BONE FRACTURES

What is Res-Q ?  This is a point-of-care system designed for the preparation of cell concentrates, including stem cells, from bone marrow aspirates and whole blood for platelet rich plasma (PRP). The product is being tested in India in a trial co-sponsored by ThermoGenesis and Totipotent SC, the company's distributor for the Res-Q in India.

The trial has evaluated n=10 of n=15 planned patients with advanced CLI. Safety and AFS (limb salvage) at one year are being evaluated. Secondary endpoints such as ABI (ankle brachial index), six minute walk test, and resting pain are showing good results.

In addition a second trial is evaluating n=16 of n=20 patients with non-union or delayed union fracture of a long bone (tibia) who have undergone composite grafting with autologous bone marrow cell concentrate to evaluate the procedure's safety and effect on fracture healing. Long bone fractures represent an unmet medical need that the med tech companies have been chasing for years. So far the system has shown no intra-operative complications, and one non-device related adverse event. Of nine patients who are now out three-to-six months post-treatment, four have fractures that have united and four have experienced partial unions of the bone fracture which is quite hopeful.

Daily Dose Conclusion: Few are paying attention to KOOL as a therapeutic player in CLI or bone fractures and as a potential challenger to Cytori or even Aastrom or Pluristem in CLI. This is worth watching.

Monday
Jan302012

Cytori (CYTX) : FDA Green Lights the Start of a Trial based on an IDE

Cytori Therapeutics (NASDAQ: CYTX) received an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) approval from the U.S. FDA to start their Phase 1 trial; "ATHENA". ATHENA will investigate the use of the Celution® System, (this is the "bedside centrifuge" that processes stem cells from fat (adipose-derived stem and regenerative cells ADRCs) to treat a form of coronary heart disease, chronic myocardial ischemia (CMI).

This IDE approval comes pretty quickly given that the application was originally submitted to the FDA in December 2011.

ATHENA is a multi-center, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, pilot trial to investigate the use of autologous, clinical-grade ADRCs, processed at the point-of-care with the Celution® System. The trial will enroll up to N=45 patients with no-option CMI who have limited therapeutic options.

It will evaluate a variety of clinical and functional outcomes, including safety, peak oxygen consumption (mVO2), and clinical outcomes at 12-months.

Previously, Cytori reported six and 18-month trial data from PRECISE, a European clinical trial for this same indication showing improvement in mVO2. In Europe, Cytori has applied to expand its Celution® System CE Mark to include no-option CMI claims based on data from the PRECISE trial. Cytori is also enrolling ADVANCE, a European pivotal trial investigating the Celution® System for acute myocardial infarction (heart attacks).

Daily Dose Take-Away: This is an exciting and interesting approach. If the trial shows strong efficacy signals it has big implications for the space. The key issues here will be:

  • Understanding what the cell population here actually is ?
  • What is its effective dose ?
  • How is biologic variability accounted for ?

For example, Baxter has completed a PII trial in the same indication, but with an enriched population of marrow derived cells (CD 34+) ? So the cell type, the active ingredient, the dose, the timing and delivery are critical variables (to name a few) for a large indication like this one.

Tuesday
Jan242012

Which Cell Therapy companies present the best value?

Which Cell Therapy companies present the best value?

We developed an analysis using public filings and annualizing the most recent quarters as of 12/31/11. As such, the accuracy is subjective to our proprietary algorithm, and this list is not mean to be all comprehensive.

We conclude that ex leaders Dendreon and MesoBlast make the space very inexpensive. The sample below represents just over $500 million in market cap for eight of the selected public companies (ex DNDN and MSB). These companies have 3 - PIII trials, 5 PII trials and several P1 trials (based on these crude metrics).

We conclude that is worth investors time to understand among these companies in terms of what they are doing and the associated probabilities of success of their trials. Recent data peaks from the Cardiology space suggests that Baxter (BAX) and their CD34 cell type may be very viable. NeoStem has a very similar approach. The retrenchment in MesoBlast shares since that company presented data at AHA in November is of concern. Cytori, Aastrom, Athersys all have active programs in cardiology while Athersys lead program is partnered with Pfizer for Ulcerative Colitis and Aastrom is entering a Phase 3 trial in CLI.

By price ($), Osiris, MesoBlast, and Dendreon are the highest $ priced stocks:

But that starts to change as we migrate to market cap:

And if we eliminate Mesoblast and Dendreon we get a better picture of the rest of the field:


And that picture changes as we adjust for debt and cash: (enterprise value). In all fairness here, we know that NeoStem with $20-$30 million in value from their China generic company, could be the cheapest name and others are / will raise capital but ex China, Athersys is the “cheapest name”.

Looking at R&D spending: IMUC, Prima and NeoStem are among the most efficient but in fairness one must adjust for the fact that Aastrom is embarking on a pivotal trial versus Prima just starting their P3 and NeoStem their P2.

Revenues: Here we have excluded NeoStem’s $65 million from China which means PCT (Cell Therapy CMO) is running at close to $10 million in annual revenues (currently).

Tuesday
Jan242012

Cytori (CYTX) Publishes Apollo (P1/2a Heart Attack) Data 

Cytori – (CYTX):  Publishes Appolo Results

Cytori Therapeutics (NASDAQ: CYTX) published previously reported six-month outcomes from their Apollo trial. This was an EU trial evaluating adipose (fat) derived stem cells (ADCs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (heart attack or AMI).

Apollo was small at N=14-patients but it was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, feasibility trial (Phase I/IIA).

In the Apollo trial all patients were treated with standard-of-care and subsequently underwent an abdominal liposuction. Each patient's adipose tissue was processed by the Celution® System where ADRCs were extracted, washed and concentrated into a syringe of clinical grade cells. Within 36 hours of the myocardial infarction and no longer than 24 hours after undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, patients received an injection of either 20 million ADRCs (n=10) or a placebo (n=4). Improvement in cardiac function by SPECT  and an improvement in blood flow  as well as a reduction in scar formation (infarct size).

Cytori claims that the “advantage of adipose tissue as a cell source is that it allows physicians to get a meaningful dose of a patient's own cells at the point-of-care when using the Celution® System without cell culture or use of donor cells". The paper’s author also states, "We believe delivering cells within the first 24 to 36 hours takes advantage of the body's signaling and initiates the repair process before irreparable damage occurs".